tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4729735685376119377.post8766835496323307136..comments2023-10-07T02:05:43.702-07:00Comments on Saral Sarkar's writings: Right to Insult or the Responsibility Principle? -- Thoughts on the Charlie-Hebdo-MassacreSaral Sarkarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14801618107395376433noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4729735685376119377.post-28252059258005208812015-03-09T08:02:12.507-07:002015-03-09T08:02:12.507-07:00The tenor of the article itself is ridiculous. CH ...The tenor of the article itself is ridiculous. CH provoked Muslims by publishing insulting cartoons of Mohammed and so in a way their killing is justified - they are not martyrs though. Oh, what are the insults? Has Sarkar viewed the cartoons? Will Sarkar publish them here and point out what is insulting. What is insulting if a cartoon is published in CH in which Mohammed says those who don't laugh are stupid asses or so? What is insulting in the latest CH front-page after the killing in which Mohammed says 'all is forgiven'? What is insulting in the cartoon in which Mohammed remonstrates an ISIS beheader who is bent on cutting his own head but ignored adamantly. Pray, then why Avijit Roy is killed in Dhaka recently? Just for exposing Islam and other religions in his 'virus of faith'. So it is a provocation and he deserved his murder. And this does not apply to FM Hussein though; he can with impunity paint vulgar nude pictures of Hindu goddesses because that is rightful expression of speech - a fundamental right. Only prosecuting him and his fleeing the prosecution is a great blow on secularism and human rights! Wah there can be no end to such hypocrites. Sorry,Saral Sarkar is trying to or already managed to join their band.I.M.Sharmahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08966462873533656616noreply@blogger.com